The validity of this installation lies, as I believe it does in all the Chapman brothers' work, in its detail. Each figure has a hand-painted facial expression, their black eyes pointing in different directions, their bodily mutations unique. In contrast to this heaving mass of humanity's downfall epitomised, the final room in the gallery displays a series of watercolour paintings by perpetrator of global war himself, Adolf Hitler, sardonically entitled If Hitler Had Been A Hippy How Happy Would We Be. A fairly proficient draughtsman, Hitler was rejected from Vienna Academy of Fine Arts in the 1910s on the fair premise that his work lacked intellectual depth.
The Chapman brothers anonymously collected a series of his original paintings from an auction and proceeded to adapt them using the same medium. The juxtaposition of this series with Fucking Hell is startling. It is difficult to believe that these delicate, detailed – albeit mediocre – drawings of flowers, cathedrals and citizens at peace were executed by one of the most ruthless, inhumane political leaders of the twentieth century; but despite the sensitivity of line they lack the integrity that is prerequisite for art to be interesting. Through their adaptation, the Chapman brothers challenge the idea of authorship, claiming that the paintings are no longer Hitler's work. They objectively consider him a bad artist, highlighting his own failures, his weaknesses. His paintings are faceless, passive and meaningless, and the artists have worked into them with images that mock their superficiality, with childlike, colourful rainbows and hesitantly drawn butterflies. It comments on the futility of war, on the complexities of the human psyche, on the naive religious notions of good and evil; but most of all, it forces you to wonder how different the world would be if Hitler had been accepted into art college. - Amy Knight
'If Hitler Had Been a Hippy How Happy Would We Be' is currently at White Cube, Mason's Yard, London from 30 May - 12 July 2008